![download borland c++ download borland c++](https://getintopc.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Intel-C-Compiler-Offline-Installer-Download-GetintoPC.com_.jpg)
Only a few years ago gcc *sucked* at C++. Most of you guys here are too new to remember the history of gcc. It might actualy spur GNU into action to improve their compiler. And if it is free, then expect it to be widely used. But it will still have a place, namely with those that think choice is the first attribute of freedom. It won't be shipped with your Redhat Subscription Service. If Borland C++ (the stand-alone compiler) won't be free then there probably won't be many users. When there is no room in Unix for an additional compiler, the end is near. A single compiler that becomes a standard is a Bad Thing.
#DOWNLOAD BORLAND C++ ISO#
A language standard like ISO Standard C++ is a Good Thing. I see the monopolists are out in force today. because Linux already has a solid toolchain of its own. But understand if I fear the worst, especially from the vague tone of that Infoworld article, where they pretend that Linux doesn't already have a decent C++ compiler. Therefore, I sincerely hope that this is a sign that the old Borland is back, and I hope they release a wonderful product, and gain massive support on Linux, and kick the gcc/g++ development crew into high gear to keep up. Only now are they waking up and marketing this product again! This also caused Borland to lose credibility with some of their long-time supporters, who likely ported their applications to Linux with some other product (like g++) and forgot about Borland/Inprise. Then other companies actually wrote and marketed Linux versions of their products whilst Borland was busy having an identity crisis (remember Inprise?). Borland took a survey and started work on Linux products. That first statement was made years ago! At the time, Linux was not very well known and companies were just starting to take notice of it. However, the main problem I have with your point is your imaginary conversation you neglected to date those statements. I already mentioned that this product might be aimed at people porting applications already written for Borland's compiler. (2) Borland's C++ compiler supports advanced features not in gcc, such as compatibility with Borland's existing C++ compiler for Windows, better support for templates, better optimization, you name it.
#DOWNLOAD BORLAND C++ LICENSE#
(1) Borland releases it free of charge or under some open source license this is a possibility, but isn't clearly stated in the article-perhaps the command-line compiler will be available free of charge, which would encourage many Linux enthusiasts to try it out.
![download borland c++ download borland c++](https://stabiliskom.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Download-Borland-C.jpg)
![download borland c++ download borland c++](https://www.embarcadero.com/images/free-tools/bcc32c-101-Berlin-screenshot.png)
This fact alone significantly narrows Borland's potential audience on Linux.
#DOWNLOAD BORLAND C++ INSTALL#
However, I sincerely doubt that many Linux users would pay to install a third-party C++ compiler suite when they already have the standard C++ compiler for Unix (g++) free and already bundled with the system. I agree that there's nothing wrong with having more tools out there.